Being one of the most notable film theorists in the world, her ideas and clear proof of misogyny in film opened up the eyes of many, and insomething that people simply accepted was finally questioned. Why do we still see the same roles for women in film and television regurgitated over and over again?
A group of female law professors have drafted a letter to the Senate expressing concern over the Kavanaugh appointment. The letter has been covered by the UK Guardian here. The full text of the letter is as follows: We are a non-partisan group of women law faculty from across the nation charged with training our students to become ethical lawyers and leaders of the bar.
We believe in and embrace the Supreme Court and all that it represents — judicial independence, fair-mindedness, and justice and equality under the law.
Judicial professionalism is not an abstract ideal. These characteristics are the building blocks of a fair and just legal system. We are deeply concerned that if Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed, he will fail to perform his duties in a manner befitting our highest Court.
Judge Kavanaugh demonstrated disrespect towards Democratic senators vested with the constitutional authority to assess his ability to serve on the Supreme Court of the United States. He continually interrupted, speaking in a tone that was inappropriate given the seriousness of the proceedings.
His condescension was especially evident in his responses to the questions of women senators. One of the worst instances of such behavior was exhibited when Senator Amy Klobuchar asked the Judge whether his drinking meant that he could not remember events. We would never allow our students to engage in such conduct even in mock proceedings or the classroom.
Many of us have participated on search committees for faculty members, deans, provosts, university presidents, and other positions. If job candidates refused to answer probative questions and side-stepped with stock answers about their pedigrees and accomplishments, their behavior would leave us with serious questions about their honesty and credibility.
We are not alone in our assessment of Judge Kavanaugh. In his lengthy opening remarks during the Senate hearing, he stated: This whole two-week effort has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the election, fear that has been unfairly stoked about my judicial record.
Revenge on behalf of the Clintons and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups. For over two centuries, Supreme Court justices have set aside their political views to evaluate claims and render rulings that advance the rule of law and reflect changes in our society.
Judge Kavanaugh has shown that he is unable to respect women in positions of power, manifests bias with respect to gender and political affiliation, does not meet basic standards of professionalism, and lacks independence, impartiality, and judicial temperament.
Additional signatories are welcome until Friday.Tuesday 20th November Richy's Blog.
If you would like to comment on Richy's blog, please use the Guild Facebook page.. Sunday 18th November Alfie’s understanding of ringing was extended a little this morning, as I explained call-changes to him as they were being rung on our arrival at Woodbridge for service ringing.
Home › Feminism › Laura Mulvey, Male Gaze and the Feminist Film Theory. Laura Mulvey, Male Gaze and the Feminist Film Theory By Nasrullah Mambrol on April 13, • (0).
Laura Mulvey (b. ) is Professor of Film and Media Studies at Birkbeck College, University of London. Film Theory – Laura Mulvey: The Male Gaze Theory Laura Mulvey is a feminist film theorist from Britain, best known for her essay on Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.
Her theories are influenced by the likes of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan (by using their ideologies as "political weapons") whilst also including psychoanalysis and. Aug 27, · Mulvey’s psychoanalytical theory () suggests that women in film signify male desire and works against the flow of a story line.
Thus adding female characters in Fight Club would disturb the ‘male gaze’ which Palahnuik intended to establish and hinder the portrayal of the hidden  anger among men towards the . Laura Mulvey¶s theory on ³gaze´ is a psychoanalytical tool in theorizing the visual pleasure derived from cinema.
Other than that, it strives to deconstruct the unconscious phallocentric order which is dominant within Hollywood films. The gaze itself is not null, it is gendered; it involves the. this theory of the male gaze has been majorly developed by Luara Mulvey, who first noticed male gaze in film In fact, out of the top grossing films of , only 15% of the directors, writers, executive producers, cinematographers, and editors were women.